View Full Version : Marlene, Jan, Janice Hurst
bowser
03-14-2008, 05:39 PM
Hi folks,
There are three different folders here of a model who I have been entranced by since I first laid eyes on her pics several years ago. She has been identified as Marlene, Jan, and Janice Hurst. Janice is the name I have always associated with her. I have seen a few pics of her here and there with the name Dolores on them as well.
Here are a couple shot of her.
http://www.myarchives.net/gallery/showimage.php?i=73342&c=253
http://www.myarchives.net/gallery/showimage.php?i=95333&c=253
Don't know what it is, but the bangs just kill me... I think it is such a sexy look. Not to mention the incredible body she has...
Can anyone tell me more about her? Bio info, years modeled, mags she appeared in, etc? Any info would be appreciated.
I also have some pics of her I haven't not seen in any of the three folders of her here. I'll try to upload some of the ones I have that I don't already see here.
Nice body, but she never showed you right up in her pussy (up to her tonsils), or wore sexy underwear (like many other models of the time).
winger
03-16-2008, 10:39 AM
While "Jan" is her own girl, there has been an ongoing discussion that Marlene and Janice are one in the same. At first I dismissed the idea. however, their breasts seem to be the sam, nipples the same, facial features darn close as well as the way both girls where their nails...identical!
bowser
03-16-2008, 11:16 PM
Nice body, but she never showed you right up in her pussy (up to her tonsils), or wore sexy underwear (like many other models of the time).
I fail to see why that's a problem. When I'm deciding if I find a girl attractive, I'm looking at her face, the shape of her body, etc. The position of her cervix is NOT something that makes a difference in whether I find her attractive or not.
And most models of that era did not do the shaving/spreading thing that is so common today. I still fail to see why it would be considered attractive, unless you're only attracted to girls that you have to tie a board to your ass so you don't fall in when you have sex with them...
TallGreenToad
03-17-2008, 03:32 AM
...discussion that Marlene and Janice are one in the same. At first I dismissed the idea. however, their breasts seem to be the (same), nipples the same, facial features darn close as well as the way both girls (wear) their nails...identical!
Might sound nutty:smile:, but manytimes length and shape of nose, shape of chin and finger joints are the only to compare models...nose in particular, as it's one of the few body parts that doesn't change with weight loss/gain.
'Course, if a model has an 'ugly' nose, then she - and the photog - take pains to hide the fact...Lisa Phillips is a good example...
bowser
03-17-2008, 09:36 PM
While "Jan" is her own girl, there has been an ongoing discussion that Marlene and Janice are one in the same. At first I dismissed the idea. however, their breasts seem to be the sam, nipples the same, facial features darn close as well as the way both girls where their nails...identical!
To my mind, they are one in the same. The similarities in the bodies, the face, it's simply too close. I don't see how they're not the same model.
Anyway, any more info about her?
15ace
06-03-2008, 08:30 AM
I know this is an old thread, but here's my 2p. If you can get a good enough pic of Janice Hurst and Marlene, check out the freckles! Both have identical ones, 2 on a diagonal above their navel and to their right and one on their left breast above the areola. I'm now convinced they are the same woman.
bowser
06-13-2008, 12:23 AM
I know this is an old thread, but here's my 2p. If you can get a good enough pic of Janice Hurst and Marlene, check out the freckles! Both have identical ones, 2 on a diagonal above their navel and to their right and one on their left breast above the areola. I'm now convinced they are the same woman.
Yes, I've noticed the very same thing myself. I've seen it in pics of all three of the models I mention here. The shape of the nose and eyebrows is also another indicator, they appear identical to my eye. And lastly, the overall build and body type is just too close; here differences in weight between the sets are negligible so the body shape is easy to see, and again, it is nearly identical for all "three" of these models.
I'm convinced they are all one in the same woman, merely posing for different mags at different times, and then perhaps a few years later on.