Bushes are better

[shah]

I was visiting the natural babes folder the other day and it made me recall how much more beautiful models and porn stars always looked with furry bushes. Does anyone agree with me here? In real life, it's nice to know for sure you're getting intimate with someone legal too! Who'll ever came up with the stupid idea of having models shave their pubes should have their head examined! There is no greater a natural beauty as a lady's unshaved and untrimmed bush :)

[WDD]

Shaving can be a bother, and the stubble can be itchy and uncomfortable. So why do women nowadays shave down below?

I could understand if a woman is quite a bit TOO hirsute to the point of appearing grotesque (though I realize some men are so into it that too much is never enough, lol!), she may trim her pubic region to something manageable and seemingly decent. But very many of today's models shave down to a "mustache" or nothing at all. I think they do it because thongs are in fashion nowadays and having pubic hair spill out over the thong is perceived as ugly or dirty.

[Tony T]

Shah - I couldn't agree with you more. I find a reasonable amount of pubic hair more erotic than a 'shaven haven'.

However, there was a time before shaven pussies became fashionable - in the 50's that a lot of photographs were airbrushed so the models almost looked androgenous, and yet back in the late 1800s they showed pubic hair!!

TT

[charliels531]

However, there was a time before shaven pussies became fashionable - in the 50's that a lot of photographs were airbrushed so the models almost looked androgenous, and yet back in the late 1800s they showed pubic hair!!

TT

Tony, it's goofier than that, even. In the early 20th Century the U.S. Congress passed the Comstock Act which gave the Postmaster General the authority to declare matter to be "obscene" and thus banned from mailing. Since mail was the only cheap, reliable way to distribute anything, publishers had to comply or go out of business.

The Postmaster General didn't want to bother, so he delegated the authority to a "consultant" who was usually a preacher who made up a list and added to it even now and then.

We should note that such lists always get longer, never shorter.

Among the hundreds of things banned was "any depiction of frontal nudity which displays public hair." That was why we had a generation or two of air-brushed porn. It was the law when Playboy started publishing. It lasted until 1966 or 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court, back when it was run by people the present administration hates, said that the system of postal censorship was unconstitutional as an abridgement of free speech.

Unfortunately mere stupidity has never been a violation of the law.

:redface:

[F U]

Yeah I love that pubic hair, as I can floss my teeth when I go down. When I see a nice pubic mound I want to sink my cock into it, but when I see a shaved gash (looking like an open wound) I want to get the hell away from there. Women are sheep, and always want what other women want, and are never happy with what they have (till it's gone !!!). If it is in the latest fashion mags they want it, and while we are on the subject, I hate plastic tits also, aswell as tattoos, and piercings.

[rainman_927]

My original and more lengthy reply is now lost in cyberspace. So, here is the cliff notes version. The display of public hair in art and scupture has been more influenced by censorship more than any other factor. This was more of the case with Euopean, than Indian or Asian Art because of the major influence of 1st the church and then politicans. As a result of the cyclical nature, you will sometimes see a sudden shift in the display of various forms of nudity, especially the pubic area. That is why you will have photos that dated a few years apart that differ so greatly.

Since the Supreme Court ruling, the trend in the display of pubic hair has been influenced by 2 major factors, fashion and the belief that shaved is more sexually erotic. (since men are mainly in control of the majority of adult magazines and the porn industry, as Pogo said "we have met the enemy and he is us") There is a direct relationship to the amount of hair to the amount of fabric. With mini, micro mini, and thongs being the rule, pubic hair decreased. I believe that Seka, was one of the 1st pornstars to shave (a great deal of her popularity was based upon that) and others started to copy her then more, until finally rather than being the exception having hair is.

Hope this helps.

[q751]

Another good name for this thread would've been: Shaved is unacceptable, trimmed is lame.

F U, that was a really great way to put it. as I can floss my teeth when I go down; but when I see a shaved gash I want to get the hell away from there

:cool:

I LOVE hairy pussies.

Awesome info, guys. I'm gonna save this thread! Can you guys post examples of airbrushed crotches?

[kevin]

Angela Jones posted by riccardo. The Harrison Marks folder has many airbrushed pics .
http://www.myarchives.net/gallery/files/7/2/3/02_06_893.jpg

[Tony T]

Also a lot of the June Palmer pics are also retouched - unfortunately:frown:


TT

[q751]

Ah, I didn't realize airbrushed was so literal: It's literally erasing the crotch. Luckily, none of the models I like on this site are airbrushed (and I like a lot of models!)!

[q751]

I hate plastic tits also, aswell as tattoos, and piercings.

No matter what? I think they both can look awesome!

[rainman_927]

The airbrush that was used for a great number of the works of Petty and Vargas continues to be used by some even up to today. It wasn't and isn't limited to the pubic area, but generally to any imperfection in the photo. Today, is almost entirely limited to film images. Photoshop is the primary method of "cleaning up" photos.

[Randall M]

I too remember the silly airbrushed photos of the 50's and early 60's (not that I am that old, necessarily....just dating the photos) and always considered them a huge turnoff.

As for the shaved-vs-bushy question, I much prefer au natural. I want a woman to look like a woman...and not like some prepubsecent child.

Some promote the shaving trend from the standpoint of hygiene, thinking that a shaved mons is somehow cleaner. I think not.

[charliels531]

I too remember the silly airbrushed photos of the 50's and early 60's (not that I am that old, necessarily....just dating the photos) and always considered them a huge turnoff.

As for the shaved-vs-bushy question, I much prefer au natural. I want a woman to look like a woman...and not like some prepubsecent child.

Some promote the shaving trend from the standpoint of hygiene, thinking that a shaved mons is somehow cleaner. I think not.

See post #4 above; please don't blame the photogs, the models, or the publishers. If anybody's to blame, it's Dwight Eisenhower's Postmaster General.

Why girls are still shaving, I dunno.:confused:

[rainman_927]

Shaving can be a bother, and the stubble can be itchy and uncomfortable. So why do women nowadays shave down below?

I could understand if a woman is quite a bit TOO hirsute to the point of appearing grotesque (though I realize some men are so into it that too much is never enough, lol!), she may trim her pubic region to something manageable and seemingly decent. But very many of today's models shave down to a "mustache" or nothing at all. I think they do it because thongs are in fashion nowadays and having pubic hair spill out over the thong is perceived as ugly or dirty.

Charlie, I believe that this quote covers part of the "why today?". I do not question it from a fashion perspective. I have always questioned the "Hitler's" moustache and other styles to the point of asking women why. The answers-range the gamut from arousal to vaginal hygene. Of the most common are imitation, peer pressure(hubby or BF) and perception(they think it is sexier).

[margib]

Hi Guys,

I only have experience of the UK situation - Harrison Marks was of course British - and his work was hugely influential in the UK in the 50's. UK law was severe and almost no sexual explicitness was permitted. HM's models shaved, I understand, to reduce the amount of work the retouchers had to do - expensive in the heavily unionised british printing industry at that time, long before computers and Photoshop, it was all done by either opaquing the print or manually engraving the zinc or copper half-tone plate. The British didn't generally have airbrushes until the early 60's.

There was also the hypocritical "Greek classical statues are OK, they have no genitals and are thus not sexy .." attitude prevalent here then. Hence no genitals at all.

We panting lads were desperate to see what the real adult woman had between their legs and seeing it without hair was even more exciting. GHM had a gallery in London with, I recall, a "gynecography" exhibition with no retouching in sight. Guys could be seen reeling out of there after an hour or so, panting for air!

That is why the early stuff in the UK was hairless. I prefer it that way because that was what I grew up with, and to see "everything" was a real turn on. Modern depilation is so widespread, and associated with hardcore, and with generally turn-off behaviour - tattoos, long claw plastic nails, lots of spitting and other stuff - that it is simply not erotic at all.

When the fashion was of its time, depilation was very alluring, and bearing in mind that the UK only had alternative magazines such as Spick and Span - just fully clothed upskirts - so it was regarded as the gold standard.

Sorry to ramble on, just one old Briton reminiscing.

Margib

[rainman_927]

I was aware of the British were very highly regulated, as was the U.S., about display of the pubic area during the period when Marks introduced Kamera. I had read that he would never have been able sell Kamera had he not "retouched" his photos that they would not have been available in normal distribution channels. One can only wonder if the original negatives survived and if they have ever been published. What a treasure.

Margib, on a related subject, the History Channel had a series on the history of sex. One covered the Victorian Era. There was a reference to a man by the name of Rankin or Ruskin, a man who had thought the "Greek" look was how a woman should appear. Reflective of the atitude of the day. It seems that on his wedding night he was so replused to see his wife in his natural glory that he never consumated the marriage. Are you familar with the story and is it fact or an urban legend?

[craig92]

I find that the bigger the bush, the more I get turned on.

I know women say that it feels way better when it's slick, and antomically it is true, but there is something about seeing a nice forest.

[riccardo]

I was aware of the British were very highly regulated, as was the U.S., about display of the pubic area during the period when Marks introduced Kamera. I had read that he would never have been able sell Kamera had he not "retouched" his photos that they would not have been available in normal distribution channels. One can only wonder if the original negatives survived and if they have ever been published. What a treasure.

Margib, on a related subject, the History Channel had a series on the history of sex. One covered the Victorian Era. There was a reference to a man by the name of Rankin or Ruskin, a man who had thought the "Greek" look was how a woman should appear. Reflective of the atitude of the day. It seems that on his wedding night he was so replused to see his wife in his natural glory that he never consumated the marriage. Are you familar with the story and is it fact or an urban legend?

John Ruskin, the English art critic, was unable or unwilling to consummate his relationship with his wife Effie (unfortunate name in the circumstances) seemingly because he was revolted by her pubic hair. She took up with the Pre-Raphaelite painter Millais - who presumably had no such scuples about spearing the bearded clam. English society of the time had so many hang-ups about sexuality that the truth of this is debatable even now; nobody really knows.

[rainman_927]

John Ruskin, the English art critic, was unable or unwilling to consummate his relationship with his wife Effie (unfortunate name in the circumstances) seemingly because he was revolted by her pubic hair. She took up with the Pre-Raphaelite painter Millais - who presumably had no such scuples about spearing the bearded clam. English society of the time had so many hang-ups about sexuality that the truth of this is debatable even now; nobody really knows.

The History Channel in their series such as this one, "The History of Sex", does fairly extensive research and usually is quite accurate with their reports. Of course, they as well as anyone could be in error.

I just thought that it was an interesting footnote, highlighting just one of the ironies of sexual attitudes of the Victorian era.

[tygrkhat40]

I suppose it all come down to personal preference. I prefer the natural look, but sometimes a shaved beaver looks pretty good.

[q751]

Hypatia Lee

http://www.myarchives.net/gallery/files/7/4/3/0/hlee_8409_prq301.jpg

[Bort Dink]

The Modern Sunbathing mag the cover I posted the other day is marked up in a way that I find laughable....the original owner went through the mag and pencilled in pubic hair on every last nude women's picture! I'm still laughing at that! Should I post the pics? I can't remove the pencil marks without damaging the paper....

[q751]

The Modern Sunbathing mag the cover I posted the other day is marked up in a way that I find laughable....the original owner went through the mag and pencilled in pubic hair on every last nude women's picture! I'm still laughing at that! Should I post the pics? I can't remove the pencil marks without damaging the paper....

That's awesome! Great little story! http://www.myarchives.net/images/icons/icon14.gif to the original owner.

[jhl1953]

Bushes are fine,as long as we're not talking Presidents.:biggrin:

[eroticland]

I was visiting the natural babes folder the other day and it made me recall how much more beautiful models and porn stars always looked with furry bushes. Does anyone agree with me here? In real life, it's nice to know for sure you're getting intimate with someone legal too! Who'll ever came up with the stupid idea of having models shave their pubes should have their head examined! There is no greater a natural beauty as a lady's unshaved and untrimmed bush :)
You took the words right out of my mouth!

And BTW: I find armpits incredibly sexy too if they got any bushes there (not too excessive though, sometimes a "stubble" is even sexier!).

Maybe it's because I like to grow my hair too. A lot of people seem to have lost connection w/ their hair, whereever it used to sprout. ;-)

Just my two euro cents,
eroticland

[qqrk]

Full bush is great. Completely shaved is alright. But that little Hitler moustache is RIDICULOUS!

[basjan]

I like my women natural. I don't shave why should they.

[qqrk]

I like my women natural. I don't shave why should they.

You're not one of those guys from ZZ TOP are ya??? LOL

[g-foyle]

I found it hilarious that on a tv show about celebrity faux-pas, they bought up the story of the female lead from 'High School Musical''s self shot nudes that leaked on the internet and the BIG DEAL was that she had shot pictures of herself WITH PUBIC HAIR!!! Like she should be locked up - a few journalists giving soundbites were saying it might even ruin her career. WTF???
I can't stand shaved now - I think it may have something to do with having two daughters who are pre-pubescent - you feel like you're looking at someone under age and it's wrong to me. I think when things change again we'll look back on this obsession and think 'why did we try to make women look like children?'

[TheZip]

Well I prefer a trimmed natural bush to the real hersute bush. If the gal has lang labia, I prefer a full shave.

It all boils down to personal preference....

[jlovessylvia]

I love a full thick bush on a woman.Too me it makes them more erotic and sexy.

[bowser]

My favorite is when a woman trims her patch like Christy Canyon used to do. Now that's hot.

[LizardKing0619]

I remember my first girlfriend had a full bush, been hooked ever since. Trimmed is nice too. Fully shaved is nice for eating, but it reminds me of pre-pubescent.

[bowser]

I remember my first girlfriend had a full bush, been hooked ever since. Trimmed is nice too. Fully shaved is nice for eating, but it reminds me of pre-pubescent.

If a girl is into getting a good tongue lashing, then trimmed is definitely the way to go, but it depends on the girl of course. With someone like Janice Hurst who has a naturally sparse bush to begin with (which is sexy by itself IMO) I wouldn't worry about it. For someone like my wife who has a very full and thick bush it would be extremely helpful. In our case though, she prefers fingers to a tongue, so it's not something that's much of a concern. Still, a woman with a full bush who keeps it trimmed short (again a-la Christy) is what I find to be the sexiest.

[shah]

I always thought Christy's bush was a lot more sexier un-trimmed. Christy did assure me once that she'd never go totally bald down there. The same goes for the 70's and 80's playmates...total natural beauty!




My favorite is when a woman trims her patch like Christy Canyon used to do. Now that's hot.

[navman10]

I find the unshaved bush quite appealing. Although, the bare vulva is attention-getting, just because there are so many kinds of vulvas: large with large labia majora, small with just the exterior appearance of a slit, wide with the exposure of the clitoral hood, etc. Of course, the hair covers the differences. Although I really like hairy crotches, I say, vive le differerance!

[dracon]

a full bush is grand :)

[putzmanship]

Bushes are fine... as long as they don't "scream out" in need of gardening more than your real garden.
If you have to travel through too much brush before you can dive in, the swimming may be dangerous.
If I can see through the jungle, I will walk down the path.
etc.
YES: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q205/putzmanship/OK.jpg
NO: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q205/putzmanship/NotOK.jpg
Thank you,
putzmanship
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q205/putzmanship/840.gif

[Tony T]

Not quite within our date range, but they very adequately and nicely demonstrate your (and my) views:biggrin:

TT

[radomiro]

Full bush is great. Completely shaved is alright. But that little Hitler moustache is RIDICULOUS!
Totally agree.

and I add: natural bush is allright but the rest: armpits, face and legs must be depilated. :biggrin:

Most of shaved pussy are: perverts or kids that the only vulva they has seen is on porn mags or videos!!! (when they meet a real girl they'll have a big surprise!! :biggrin:)

[shah]

We have some great bushes on this site. Think about some of the babes? Christy Canyon, Kellie Everts, Candy Samples, Uschi Digart, Linda Gordon (i love her trail fuzz from her pubes to her navel), Clyda Rosen, Gillian pearl, Kitten Natividad, Laura Sands, Pauline Hickey, Carol Tanner ( i wish we had more than just a couple pics of hers), several Playboy playmates & Penthouse pets have great ones too! Who are some your favorites, guys?

[lagriek]

I believe that one may choose to live by his or her own desires. Some bushes make the woman's femininity blossom, while other woman are desirable without the bush, does it matter when they look fantastic.

[bowser]

We have some great bushes on this site. ... Who are some your favorites, guys?

I'll definitely agree with Christy, and Clyda. I the little treasure trail she has there going down from her navel is a turn on to me. But it really depends on the woman; Janice Hurst was naturally very sparse, and she's one of my favorite classic models, but perhaps part of the appeal of her patch for me is that I find the rest of her incredibly appealing as well.

In all, I don't like either extreme; Gillian Pearl is too much for me, but shaved leaves me cold too.

[jever]

Hmmm, i can't agree to most of the above opinions.
Yes, vintage porn turns me on, even if the models are hairy, but it really turns me on, when they are bald shaved.

I loved the CCC New Cunts series with all those shaved models. I'm always happy, finding bald vintage models.

Maybe the reasons for shaving are different in the US than in Europe, anyway i think it's more esthetic.

Je\/eR

[Hukelfrukel]

It's always a surprise when you have a one night stand. Will she have a bush or will she be shaved? I don't mind a little trim but the full bushes last longest with me. :biggrin:

[teehee]

You can hardly pick up a mag in this day & age and see a real bush!If there's hair it's usually that little strip thing...
I like some Mystery!I also love a line of hair coming up from down there to the navel.

[q751]

I second that comment, teehee.

[DEATHMAN]

The reason I like the porn movies from the late 60s and 70s is because they had a good hairy bush, none of this shaved lark.

[shah]

Me too! I could watch a bushy woman receiving oral or riding a guy endlessly! There is just some type of erotic sensuality when it comes to bushy females having sex whether it be on video or in person :)




The reason I like the porn movies from the late 60s and 70s is because they had a good hairy bush, none of this shaved lark.

[flexy32]

I agree, I never shave my bush. The natural look is so much better..

[jayvan]

I'm definitely a fan of All Natural. The early 70s was my "discovery" period as a young teenager, and so as many of you will recall, a good nudie pic wasn't complete without a glimpse of the "black triangle". I'm still fond of a good-quality black and white photo showing full nudity. And yes, I go limp at the sight of piercings, tattoos everywhere, too much make-up, bubble-boobs... and why, oh why, do they keep their high-heel shoes on during lesbo scenes?

[DemonD]

I have heard it said that a woman's pubic hair is symbolic of her sexual power. That being the case, might the current fad of shaved women be a male conspiracy to de-power women?

Of course, many women shave just so they can fit into today's bikinis. My own opinion of that is that if they're showing that much skin already, why not just go nude to the beach?

Clyda Rosen remains my all time fave!

[teehee]

Whew...not that I really care what peeps think,but am glad I'm not 'alone' in loving a big bush! I've had a few chicks in my life think I was somewhat sick for it.

Welcome to the jungle!

[paulscott]

The more hair the better. The great thing about retro porn are the nice bushes on Laura Sands, Kay Parker, Vanessa Del Rio, Honey Wilder, Hyapatia Lee, Candy Samples, etc.

[bowser]

As long as it's not out of control, I'm fine with it. I love Clyda's foliage... makes her look like a real woman. Gillian Pearl is too much for me though.

[goldman64]

this is an interesting one, for me theres 2 sides to it....i like shaved girls, but funnily enough they need to be very slim, i dont like heavier more voluptuous girls when they shave...

i prefer a trimmmed bush on the heavier girl, the gilrs in these forums for the most part are better with some hair, as i consider most of the older images to be of girls with more 'va voom' so to speak...

so for the voluptuous retro images, give me trimmed bush, not a fan of overgrowth..
for the younger slim girl of today, i like the bald look..

[shah]

I don't mean to be demeaning those who prefer bald by the following remark, but when i've seen porn with a women with bald pubes, i feel like i'm watching a underage female and feeling like i'm doing something illegal at the same time.
Bushes accentuates a woman's beauty. A real furry one adds a touch of mystique to the lady as well. To put it plain and simple...bushes are prefered and much more beautiful :)

[Bort Dink]

I'm thinking that during the Japanese feudal period (Shoguns period) women used to pluck or shave their pubic hair just before they were married. Now they keep it on. Either way though, that country is a male preserve and has been for centuries. Nothing about empowering women is coming out of there...

[Gelardo]

It is the natural look that is so great about it. The presence of pubic hair also reflects maturity in the women.

[q751]

I'm only 21 and I wanna tell girls these days to grow bushes.

"Can you like, grow your bush?"

[paulscott]

Fully shaved pussies just plain look un-natural. Hair may be making a comeback--there is a porn star today by the name of Laurie Vargas whose claim to fame is a hairy pussy. And she is quite popular.

[Ramon05]

Always been a fan of the natural look, always will be.

[bovon]

:smile:
http://img266.imagevenue.com/loc500/th_53089_ML-JP_123_500lo.jpg (http://img266.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=53089_ML-JP_123_500lo.jpg)

[q751]

Always been a fan of the natural look, always will be.

Damn right!

[oudezijds]

Totally agree.

and I add: natural bush is allright but the rest: armpits, face and legs must be depilated. :biggrin:

Most of shaved pussy are: perverts or kids that the only vulva they has seen is on porn mags or videos!!! (when they meet a real girl they'll have a big surprise!! :biggrin:)

I am amazed at all of the value judgements about people and their motives and what should and shouldn't be erotic because it is your opinion. If a woman presents me with a bushless slit (in a relationship, not a prostitute) I bow humbly then start eating.:tongue: You have to pry me loose with a crowbar. No more trips to the dentist for a haircut either.:wink: And I certainly can't judge peoples preferences for straps and hose, shaving, leather, just because it isn't for me. Go to the Only Shaved (completely) Models thread and live a little. In the mean time didn't I leave a copy of N*w C*nts laying around here somewhere?

armpits, face and legs must be depilated. - Says you! Obviously you aren't effected by the media you see or cultural pressure, say like those perverts and kids. Especially not a worldly open-minded spirit like yourself.

This was originally a multi-screen rant about open mindedness and who decides what goes on in our bedrooms and being provincial. I don't want to fight. I only want people to see the value of being accepting of others. Seldom have I ever seen or heard of a man who turned down a chance to be with a women if she looked like a water buffalo, let alone her state of hairiness.

Why does a dog lick himself? - a)because he can b)he doesn't have an opposable thumb

de Vlieg

[bowser]

No more trips to the dentist for a haircut either.:wink:
de Vlieg

Clearly you need to improve your technique if you have such a problem...

Must be an amateur. :wink:

[basjan]

I will always love a natural woman. If you watch most of today`s erotic movies, it has fake boobs and most of the women has had a visit to the plastic surgeon. Keep it natural!!

[q751]

God damn, god damn, god damn. Bushes are so much better it isn't even funny!

Just needed to get that off my chest.

[craig92]

I will always love a natural woman. If you watch most of today`s erotic movies, it has fake boobs and most of the women has had a visit to the plastic surgeon. Keep it natural!!
Yes, and if there is ANY bush left, it looks like a sideways hitler's moustache. I've seen more hair on their eye brows sometimes.

[Rackmstr]

It has been so long since I have had my hands (lips, tongue or anything else) on a "bearded" lady I almost forgot how good it was. Joining this forum and through reading some of these posts have made me think I need to find some soon!

[q751]

Haha. How old are you, just outta curiosity?

[Rackmstr]

50 my friend. I grew up with all of the classic 70s porn stars.

[n4k3d]

I'm definitely a fan of All Natural. The early 70s was my "discovery" period as a young teenager, and so as many of you will recall, a good nudie pic wasn't complete without a glimpse of the "black triangle". I'm still fond of a good-quality black and white photo showing full nudity. And yes, I go limp at the sight of piercings, tattoos everywhere, too much make-up, bubble-boobs... and why, oh why, do they keep their high-heel shoes on during lesbo scenes?

My thoughts exactly.

After this site, and I am new and now hooked on Vintage sex, my favorite girls are from Abby Winter. Every day girls that are [mostly] with hair.

To me shaved pubes are ugly and remind me of pre pubescents which I do not want to consider. I like my women obviously of age.

[mogamba]

"When the field grows turf, it's time to play the game."...so true...I remember reading a "Playboy Advisor" answer which stated that pubic hair acted as a dry lubricant. So true! The Barbie-look is going bye-bye and I coudn't be happier.

Hoooray for Hair!

[n4k3d]

thanks for your astute quote! naturalness, including hair, is far better than the inflated, adjusted and removed.

these are all used to extremes, where subtleness of approach can be appreciated.

lightly trimmed bush can be acceptable to me as can be an ultra short haircut, until the wonderful lesbians killed that style.

[classiclegslover]

I don't mind some hair...I mean after all if she is an adult she should have some. I just don't wanna see a jungle down there. I do agree on the tats and piercings though...really don't like them too much at all. HATE tats 99% of the time...can tolerate piercings every now and then.

[cleanhead]

"When the field grows turf, it's time to play the game."...so true...I remember reading a "Playboy Advisor" answer which stated that pubic hair acted as a dry lubricant. So true! The Barbie-look is going bye-bye and I coudn't be happier.

Hoooray for Hair!

Here are some pics with my ex/gf shaving her legs. Her bush and pits she had never shaved, even her legs only one time in a year before beach time. The rest of the year she was compleatly unshaved.

[noregreb]

I agree; non shaved is better

[supperkat]

I loved to put my hands on a warm pussy with bush and run your hand and finger through it,just nice and silky hair it turns a man on.I go in the natural section a lot because most girls in photos are clean shaven.And yes those bikini women wear today tells them shave that hair down their Kids on the beach don't want to see that.
But as a man a lot to see that.

[landwaster]

I'm a big fan of Hya. Thanks for the pic

[Boblo50]

Well, I'm 59 and I can recall the airbrushed days well enough - getting what sneak peaks you could it whatever magazine you could find. When you get that first opportunity at the real thing, and the fingers encounter the edge of the margin you've been aiming for, who can deny the electric thrill you encountered?

In addition to that, if the girl let you get to that point, you would assume that you have achieved the first objective in the mission! The second was now a possibility!

Of course, as the bikinis got smaller (and some today are definitely larger than they were in the early 70s) the girls trimmed the boundaries inside the bikini area. Hence the Bikini Wax that was common before the wholescale depilation of today.

I suspect that the preference for 'au natural is down to the psychology of the testosterone-fuelled moments of adolescence (or later). This is a bit like the tights/stockings argument (probably another thread on another forum??). At the end of the day, the preference for the hairless look is probably in line with the crass nature of modern porn, and the need to obscure as little as possible for the camera - compounded by the need to make the relevant area as pre-pubescent as possible.

Personally, I like it long enough to be natural, not so long as to need a machete to gain entry, and not so short that it makes my lips sore.

And finally, being older, I just wonder just how many of the girls/women out there really do go overboard with the razor. In my more adventurous days, it was normal ro encounter the pubic hair, but now, I just wonder, were I to be in such a position again, what would I find?

[takano]

love bushes :tongue:

[basjan]

A full bush, is the only bush i like.

[precum4her]

Personally, I like it long enough to be natural, not so long as to need a machete to gain entry, and not so short that it makes my lips sore.


That is, to me, a great way to put it (for my preference). I prefer a woman to look mature sexually. OTOH, I don't prefer her to look like a man. I have no need for a woman with hormonal imbalance, even if others get turned on by that (which might be something for some to examine).

Nice choice of words, Boblo.

[cogman]

Personally, I like it long enough to be natural, not so long as to need a machete to gain entry, and not so short that it makes my lips sore.

And finally, being older, I just wonder just how many of the girls/women out there really do go overboard with the razor. In my more adventurous days, it was normal ro encounter the pubic hair, but now, I just wonder, were I to be in such a position again, what would I find?[/QUOTE]

I coludn't agree more with your statements. We won't go into tats and piercings.

[amorous945]

Yeah, personally, I love the natural look of a woman, too. I think the shaving thing is a bit of a fad and may lose popularity in time. I kind of liked it for awhile, but it wasn't long before I realized that I really like an unshaven pussy best. Of course, to each his own, but this is just my preference.

[papabear3333]

I like it to tickle my ears when I eat out.

[Jim Beatty]

I don't like to see women shaved - they look naked and vulnerable, when they should be nude and seductive. I remember a comedian talking about the Windmill Theatre in London in the 1950's. The audience at the Windmill were mainly striptease acts and scenes of nudity. Between such acts, up-and-coming comedians were tried out on a largely unresponsive audience of middle aged men who came in raincoats to ogle at the women.
The comedians had to enter the stage through the dancers' changing room. In one of their routines the girls wore black gloves and shoes and not much else, and when he saw them after they had just come off the stage he said:
"I was reminded of a hand of playing cards, all of them showing the Five of Spades."

[goldman64]

i must admit i find the whole 'pre-pubescent' argument quite strange.....

i accept the preference here for bushes, no probs with that, my earlier post indicates that...
BUT adults male and female naturally grow hair, yet we shave our faces, legs, underarms even trim eyebrows ffs.....how come the removal of bush makes people feel they are bordering on pedophilia ?????

maybe i better grow my beard in case the missus thinks she screwing a 10 yo boy...

[chengny]

One of the most inviting bushes I have ever seen - you could just about lay your head in there and snuggle down. And bear in mind, this girl had some serious mons and underbelly to cover. It's one thing for a little wisp of a girl (like Sooty for example) to have a thick bush, there just is not much area to cover; but Karen... look at some of those shots!


Her bush, literally, extends from hip to hip. And she was kind of WASPY, as opposed to some other really ethnic types. It is tough for a fair skinned girl to go up against a Mediterrenean type.

I would have loved to see that beauty in it's untrimmed state with Karen 40-50 lbs lighter! That would have been something to write home about.

[bowser]

I would have loved to see that beauty in it's untrimmed state with Karen 40-50 lbs lighter! That would have been something to write home about.

The Karen with the 40-50 isn't anyone I'd turn away given the opportunity... she's still a sex goddess just as is in these pics.

[sub006]

OTOH Karen might have some blonde Northern Italian in her background.

[xaldupis]

thank you very mach for your cheer

[BEAUABER237]

i must admit i find the whole 'pre-pubescent' argument quite strange.....

i accept the preference here for bushes, no probs with that, my earlier post indicates that...
BUT adults male and female naturally grow hair, yet we shave our faces, legs, underarms even trim eyebrows ffs.....how come the removal of bush makes people feel they are bordering on pedophilia ?????

maybe i better grow my beard in case the missus thinks she screwing a 10 yo boy...

Do you shave your pubes? I think few men do...for most men the other places aren't erotic As far as the other areas go, it started out either as hygiene (facial hair, underarms) for men dating from wartime (to avoid the mechanized cooties infesting it - same reason for short military head hair. Facial hair is limited by the need to wear a potective mask under NBC conditions. Take an old soldier's word for it that limited hair is just eaier to keep clean in the field) or comfort (ladies wearing hosiery). The only place where fashion comes in is in trimming eyebrows.

[rand]

I must confess that some of my dislike for shaved pussies is that it makes the lady look too young. Of course, it never stopped me from lusting after Teri Weigel.

[casagrande]

Agree totally, decently trimmed bushes are quite erotic as they reveal little yet promise a lot. Many of my generation-friends still argue whether they are tits or bushes fans! To me, both are equally exciting in the perfect woman

[Camps]

Here's a comparison of Diane Webber Natural and air brushed (not by Me!)

[Tony T]

Here's a comparison of Diane Webber Natural and air brushed (not by Me!)

The left one (picture:biggrin:) is far nicer - in my opinion.

TT

[Woweeth]

I go with Tony T left is best. :rolleyes:

[n4k3d]

one of the nicest bodies ever, especially with the bush.
the air brush job is terrible to boot, but quality would not have helped the maiming of beauty.

[Bokal]

I certainly love a full dark bush (or even not dark), I don't particularly like wild untrimmed bush though. I've been known to turn down shaved pussy. It does nothing for me, I don't understand the fascination with it. I guess I'm just old school- which is why I think this is such a great website.
Bokal

[Stitch]

I refer to see hair on a woman.

[oldgrowth]

I prefer natural hirsuite women. Although, if there's too much, oral sex can get akward. But in the end, it's worth the trade off.

[Cyborg1]

I love pussy. Smooth or hairy, cropped or ready to braid, I'll take it like I get it and be thankful to get to play with/lick/poke it.

I used to know a girl that only shaved her legs to about half way between her knees and the top of her thighs. She never wore very short miniskirts (I am 59 also) so it didn't matter until she went to the pool. Looked odd but that was all. The few wisps of hair that escaped the crotch of her suit were intriguing not off-putting. I dated one for a while who cropped pretty severely to keep everything within her suit bottom.

The only time I have seen a woman I thought might want to consider cropping/shaving was one time at a water park. Nice looking young woman. Good figure and all. Pretty face. She was wearing a string bikini. Had the ass for it, too. Problem was her bush was a nice triangle that was outside her suit bottom all the way around. Even went down the inside of her legs a ways. It just looked "off" to me. A different suit or some serious cropping would have solved the problem. But if her significant other liked her that way who was I to complain? If I didn't like looking at all that hair I only had to look elsewhere. It did make for a couple of interesting questions from my 14 year old son, though.

Again, I am a poor man. I take pussy - like I take pretty much everything else - any way I can get it.

[profvolup]

I love full bush, matching her hair atop. Hence why I love curvy, busty brunettes with a full bush. I love to see them in tops with no bottom. The bush becomes "crotchless underwear" that is soft, offers no protection, but teases you from seeing the pink. ;)

I've never had a problem eating a bushy woman out. It doesn't bother me at all. I've never, ever gagged, not once. I can part it with my mouth and tongue and it bothers me none.

With that all said, yes, it's safe to say I love Italians, Greeks and others from the Med that have dark, raven brunette looks, full bushes and are -- in general -- total fuck monsters that like to have their womanhood serviced by both male tongue and male rod. ;)

[bigmick]

One of the most inviting bushes I have ever seen - you could just about lay your head in there and snuggle down. And bear in mind, this girl had some serious mons and underbelly to cover. It's one thing for a little wisp of a girl (like Sooty for example) to have a thick bush, there just is not much area to cover; but Karen... look at some of those shots!


Her bush, literally, extends from hip to hip. And she was kind of WASPY, as opposed to some other really ethnic types. It is tough for a fair skinned girl to go up against a Mediterrenean type.

I would have loved to see that beauty in it's untrimmed state with Karen 40-50 lbs lighter! That would have been something to write home about.

Karen Brown was IT for me - EVERYTHING! - Absolutely heavenly.:tongue:

[jozzch4]

I was visiting the natural babes folder the other day and it made me recall how much more beautiful models and porn stars always looked with furry bushes. Does anyone agree with me here? In real life, it's nice to know for sure you're getting intimate with someone legal too! Who'll ever came up with the stupid idea of having models shave their pubes should have their head examined! There is no greater a natural beauty as a lady's unshaved and untrimmed bush :)

I agree maybe it will come back in style.

[Cyborg1]

I saw an interesting one this morning. Lovely little thing had everything depillated except her outer lips. Those she had trimmed down very close. Interesting approach. Very "Homer Simpson" like.

I still say I am a poor man and I'll take pussy any way I can get it.

---------------------------------------
When I was young and poor I used to say "peace, but only if she's young, good-looking and cheap". Alas, I am no longer young so the "young" and "good-looking" parts have long since gone by the boards. I am as poor as ever so "cheap" is still the order of the day, however.