Lotta Topp?

[NaturalOnly]

Does Lotta Topp really belong here? For that matter, does any fake-titted b*tch merit having her pics posted here? When I think of "retro" or "vintage" silicone-infused women don't ever come to mind. It kinda goes against the spirit and intent of this website.

[kevin]

Lotta Topp - as long as she fits within the rules she would be ok, we also have Kitten Natividad and maybe a couple of others - it's a matter of personal taste.

[Orvar66]

I agree whit kevin....its all a matter of personal taste..enough said.
Orvar66.

[legin]

Like member NaturalOnly I too HATE fake/enhanced boobs...But as Orv' says,it is down to personal taste.....Other well known vintage girls with fakes are Roxy Brewer (no thank you,sorry R.B. fans) and the very attractive Monique Dev',one of the very earliest models to have a little help in the chest region.

[TheZip]

Don't forget the beauty of an enhanced Honey Bee. My personal taste is to avoid augmented gals. Today's bushel basket boobs are way too much for me to stomach, however, the early gals didn't seem to go to any of these extremes. My small collection includes the known retro enhanced gals just for completeness.

[jhl1953]

Variety is the spice of life!

We don't all like exactly the same thing.

If you want to start being picky and only want your particular choice in women then perhaps you do not belong here.

there is a great variety of different types of women shown here

I do not enjoy all of them but understand that others may enjoy the ones that I do not.

If the the title or discription of this site was "All natural big tits",then and only then I could agree with you.

But the Title "My Archives" "Authentic Vintage Porn"is an all encompassing title.

If you are going to start saying this or that doesn't belong here based only on your personal likes and dislikes then it sounds like you want a site specific to your needs"only big natural tits"

If that is what you want ,you're in the wrong place.

[Mushashi7]

Implants are, in my eyes, just as artificial as false eyesbrows, mascara, surgical removal of fat, earrings, high heels etc. All things that are used to point out a womans (or mans) sex better than nature did it for that particular person.

As soon as you grab your hairbrush after showering you are changing your natural looks. So, it is not a new thing. It has existed since before the stoneages.

I agree, not all implants are well made. And they are not as soft as the natural ones. But I must admit although I prefer the natural some results are worth more than a single glance *cough*

And we can't forbid women images just because they have a newly invented form of sexual enhancement. It is part of the time period we live in.

Honey Bee and Roxanne Brewer were some of the first models to get implants btw.

[shah]

I personally have no problem with 'enhanced' breasts...just as long as they don't look too fake.

[shannon4027]

Implants are, in my eyes, just as artificial as false eyesbrows, mascara, surgical removal of fat, earrings, high heels etc. All things that are used to point out a womans (or mans) sex better than nature did it for that particular person.

And we can't forbid women images just because they have a newly invented form of sexual enhancement. It is part of the time period we live in.

As I have already admitted that I have bleached my hair for most of my life, that is artificial also, but no one seems to mind. Even the black haired pictures are artificial because the true colour of my hair (to the best of my recollection — it's been a long time since I saw it — was a dark chestnut brown). :biggrin:

I wouldn't object to a woman artificially enhancing too small boobs (like an A) but I don't find overly enhanced boobs attractive, on anyone (i.e., above a DD). Few women are naturally over DD unless they are also fat.

Mush, I know that Virginia Bell — one of your favorites — was natural, but I saw her in person with two male friends, and none of us thought she was sexy. She seemed too outlandish. Toni (my friend who stripped with her) said she was a nice person though, so I guess you would have liked her.

I agree with most of your comments, Mush, but I hate high heels. I wish men never thought they were sexy.:frown: I would never wear high heel shoes, and as as consequence, I am about the only woman in yoga with normally shaped feet. (We get to see a lot of feet in yoga.)

Artificial is fine, as long as it enhances, not distracts from the overall portrait of the woman, and as long as the woman is not harmed by using the artificial "enhancement."

[Mushashi7]

The way I see it, very plain, very simple:

Breasts are one of the main visible differences between the two sexes.

More breast = more woman.

I know. I said it was simple.

Not everyone feels like this. Many men prefer average size. Some like the flat teeny size.

Luckily there are breasts for every taste.

[burpman]

IMHO I generally am not a fan of the enhanced models but some models can pull it off, I think Lotta gets away with it as she has a bit of that lascivious quality about her being a mature star of that era. Not all models can do it and the general trend toward silicone at the end of the 80's was part of the death knell for the classic era. That being said, there are a couple exceptions - for me personally - that work. Say for instance Chessie Moore, early on in her career the silicone was an improvement but then later became obscenely grotesque. So I generally agree with N/O but I do think there are some exceptions.

[riko1suave]

Does Lotta Topp really belong here? For that matter, does any fake-titted b*tch merit having her pics posted here? When I think of "retro" or "vintage" silicone-infused women don't ever come to mind. It kinda goes against the spirit and intent of this website.


If you hate fake tits then I'm sure you hate Candy Samples. She's about as vintage as it gets.

Believe it or not breast augmentation has been around since 1895 and some girls you think are natural, is just a damn good job of plastic surgery.

[Ichi]

Kitten Natividad, one of my all time favorites (along with Lotta Top and her proto-penis),
also had fake boobs...

I do not care for Roberta Pedon so I do not download her pics, in the same vein I feel no need to complain about her since I know many others like her pics.

The OP should only download and look at what they like and not worry about the site content.

[sub006]

Silicone injections began to surface in the mid-'50s and reached national attention with Carol Doda's publicity splash in 1964, confirmed by LIFE magazine in 1966. Bag implants came along a bit later.

With 1980 our cut-off for "vintage" models, I think we have to accept augmented ladies spanning the 20 or 25 years prior as legitimate subjects.

I generally prefer natural wonders, but some surgeons are true artists who produce amazing results. Make-up, wigs, corsets and other accessories can turn "fives" into "eights" or better, so why deny models or their photographers any tools that enhance female attractiveness or sex appeal?

As Ichi says, zip past or otherwise ignore them, but don't ban 'em from other members who like enhanced women.

[slapstick]

If you hate fake tits then I'm sure you hate Candy Samples. She's about as vintage as it gets.

I may be wrong but I understand that her "bristols" were engineered quite late in life, her early stuff is all her...(woof)

[Mushashi7]

Isn't it all a matter of taste?

There are natural breasts that looks just great, and those who looks like something undefined ugly.
The same goes for implants. Either they are well made and just fits, or they look like an Afganistan battlefield.

What about piercings (earings), Lipstick, high heels, wigs?
I think it is a matter of culture and taste.

[scheiterhaufen]

"does any fake-titted b*tch merit having her pics posted here?"

YES. if her working period was within the commonly agreed upon timeline.

"When I think of "retro" or "vintage" silicone-infused women don't ever come to mind. It kinda goes against the spirit and intent of this website."

YOU THINK and it goes against the intent of a website that is formed everyday by I dont know how many people. I cant quite believe that thats possible.

Kevin said all there is to say on the topic of who should be in the galleries and who shouldnt.

There are so many ladies in the gallery that I dont like. And I do the same to them what I do to women on the street who I dont consider goodlooking or fake: I DONT LOOK AT THEM TOO LONG. But I would never say that they dont have a right to be around.

This vintage thing got me years ago and to me its not a reminiscence (for I am too young for that) but a kind of temporal homesickness. I like the lighting, the colors, the lack of photoshop, the humour of the pictures. Lets say the craft of the images. And I like the bodies of the people in the pictures. But this is a discussion of aesthetics. If somebody told me that Linda Gordon's, Michelle Angelo's or Adrienne Stoute's boobs were fake, it would not make their images any worse.

My plead is not as much to discuss the plastic or non-plastic breast, but to stick within the set time frame.

VINTAGE IS A MERIT OF TIME NOT OF BODYPARTS.